pelosi to keep around. >> that's a wrap on news watch this week. thanks to judy and jeff. thanks for watching. see you next week. maybe things are too black and white for me. i don't usually see a lot of shades of gray. you either sent help or you didn't. youyo either are telling the truth, or you're not. hello and welcome to justice. this week in its first white house conference in eight months, president obama was asked the benghazi question. did you give the order to save american lives? >> my orders to my national security team were do whatever we need to do to make sure they're safe. >> really? how come the ac-130s and the f-f-16s16s were not dispatched?

you and only you, mr. president, can send the military into another country. why is it the cavalry never came for the four americans calling for help? when asked about their not getting the help and what you would say to their families, here's your answer. >> you know, i'll address the families not through the press. i'll address the families directly as i already have. >> really? sean smith's mother pat, ty wood's father charles said on this very show you didn't answer them directly, that you were not sincere, and they are still waiting. and as for that susan rice debacle ... >> for them to go after the u.n. ambassador who had nothing to do with benghazi and was simply making a presentation based on tellens that she had received, and d to besmirch her reputation

is outrageous. >> outrageous? if she had nothing to do with benghazi, why did you even send her out? why not the secretary of state? or the other people above rice? might this have been a dress rehearsal t ao test whether she could follow those make-believe narratives? and by the way, to me, outrageous is a so-called professional repeating a story and a conclusion five times on national television without the facts. we all know you had the facts. the auto, the visual, the drone, the intelligence, the secure communications, and we all know that she could readily access those facts. but enough about that. and a this week your then cia director david petraeus finally talked and said his intelligence

report was scrubbed. so who scrubbed it? who changed it? i'm not going to hold my breath on that one. >>at and why would the good general in a closed door senate intel meeting back on september 14th promote this video nonsense v and then stay silent for six weeks while the nation debated and the families waited? why not come out and say i didn't mean to confuse you or maybfue i didn't put enough emphasis on this? enter the women. men cheat. women cheat. for the most part, it's between a husband and wife and none of our business, but this is different. did the cia director not object to a narrative for so long because he didn't want to lose his job? he didn't want you to lose the election, or maybe because

someone was holding a dirty little secret over his head? yes, men cheat and women cheat, but at this level, though, affairs do matter. when you're the director of the cia, you're at the pinnacle of power with access to virtually everything. pillow talk can be lethal. and with me now is congressman devin nunez on the house intelligence committee joining us from california. congressman, thanks for being with us this evening. >> always a pleasure, judge. thank you. >>as congressman, just between u and me, what happened at that intel meeting? >>le well, i think it's importat to make one thing perfectly clear to the american people that i don't think has been in the news for the last few days. that is that our men and women in the cia and through the other intelligence services got this exactly right. it was a terrorist attack. we knew that within 12 hours.

>> all right. so we knew -- >> so the brave men and women who protect us, when it left them and it got to the people who serve at the pleasure of the president, things changed. that's what we're trying to get to the bottom of now. >> t well, congressman, let me k you this. is what general petraeus or what the former director of the cia, is what he said a this week at odds with what he told senate intel on september the 14th, three days after the attack and how does he explain it? >> when we went back to that day, there was this whole narrative essentially being forced to the american people about the youtube video. it came on your show and said it can't possibly be the youtube video. nobody believed that it was the youtube video exceptop for the president and the people who served him and no one else. no foreign country, no one in our intelligence apparatus, no one. so after that point we come back

and the general comes in and says well, and he kind of parsd words essentially is the way i put it in that he did mention it's true that in the unclassified talking points that the al-qaeda portion could have been classified. >> do you buy that, congressman? >> no. i don't buy that. i don't think anyone buys that. but remember, no one bout the youtube video to begin with. it's only the people around the presiden at who have essentially formed a circle around the president and are making excuses to protect the president. >> did general petraeus have any information as to who deleted al-qaeda from the talking points that ended up coming out of the mow of susan rice? >> o we had three different hearings this week, and throughout that time all that i know is that after it left our

professionals and went to the policy makers, it changed. now, look. i can put a handful of names out there that could have changed it. i don't want to really a split because hecu we need to get to e bottom of it but it's somewhere between the cia director, the director of dni, the national security cit council, the presi, the vice-president, and a few others around his cabinet. it has to be somewhere in there that this changed. >> congressman, do you think you'll have the ability to actually inquire as to the individuals in charge of those agencies as to whether or not they, in fact, took al-qaeda out of those talking points? >> well, here's what i think is possible. the men and women in uniform and notif in uniform and the cia and other intelligence agencies got it right. they're thege ones that are beig smeared right now, so i am hoping that those men and women come forward because the more information we have from them and thema more information we gt from the people who are providing the information, we

might be able to get to the bottom of who could have possibly changed the information. >> congressman nunes, thanks for joining us this evening. >> always a pleasure, judge. >> j aoining us on the phone isa member of both the armed services committee and the senate foreignhe relations committee. senator, thanks so much for being with us this evening. >> judge, it's good to be with you. >> all right, senator. the issue, of course, is what general petraeus said on the 14th and what he said this week and how is it that he was able to explain the divide between the two. >> i think, judge, you know, they're being too nice about this whole thing because petraeus, first of all, we know now what he did. he used the name al-qaeda. that was in his report. now, ther if you remember back n 9/11, the original 9/11, the

director of national intelligence was established so that the president would know. >> right. >>w so it went to clapper. he's a guy that answers to the president. i'm sure holder was in on it. the chief of staff was there, and then you had thomas, what is it, his national security advisor. all right. that's everybody. all answer to the president, and so it had to be justt the names that we just mentioned. if anyone out there in america is so naive that they think the president himself did not know that it was a terrorist attack that i involved al-qaeda, then they're so terribly naive, and i think this will go down in history as one of the biggest coverups of allt time. i really believe that. i feel a little bit personal on this thing because i knew the ambassador, and in fact, he was in my office in washington just a matter of weeks before all

this happened. >> senator, in addition to the fact that we now know that the original talking points reflected what they knew in real-time for the course of many hours, were you able to determine whether or not the president had issued an order to protect our men on the ground who were asking for help? >> well, it depends on which person they ask, judge. in april it was the ied. then after that they hit the compound, the british compound. they had the good judgment to close everything down and get out of there. only we stayed. ambassador stephens made several requests all the way up through september the 4th and the 9th, but his requests began in

may. >> senator, i'm running out of time here. we know that we were the last man standing there, but on that night does anyone know whether the president gave the order to send in the military, dispatch the military to protect our men? >> no. >> no. >> in fact, i don't think he did. keep in mind, there were a lot of assets around other than the ones we've mentioned. >> all right. senator inhoff, we hope to have you studio one of these days. thanks for joining us. >> thank you, judge. coming up, the president defends ambassador susan rice. what's he so hot and bothered about. later, what will the upcoming fbi and cia investigation into the sex scandal turn up?

to say that she is unqualified to be secretary of state i think is a mistake, and

the way it keeps going, it's almost as if the intent is to assassinate her character. >> theirhe intent to assassinate herll character. really? >> president obama and top dems are coming to the defense of ambassador susan rice. another clue that she's to be named hillary clinton's replacement as secretary of state? k.t. emergenc mcfarland joins m. all right. you were in the white house when there were individuals briefed, and you were in the room preparing them to go on national television. >> absolutely. >> to talk security issues. >> absolutely. when somebody goes on national television to talk security issues, do they ask any questions or go out with their talking points? >> she was given talking points and she went out and delivered talking points. why? because she took that as a try out to be secretary of state. the buzz had been she was going to be hillary's replacement.

there werehe other people being considered for the job. she went out and deliver the message she was given. i checked to see why was that th -- tha why was that the not the secretary of state? n washington that day. they could have gone on the five shows. my guess is they wouldn't touch it because they didn't think it was the right thing to say. she was the loyal soldier. she did her tryout to be sect of state, and i think having given those talking points which later turned out to be a complete fairy tale. >> it's not just a fair tale in terms of they took out all the references to al-qaeda, but to come out with this spontaneous story about the video and she did it over and over again. let me ask you this, kt. there's going to be a fight if they try to get her. >> absolutely. >> we got a point from senator graham and whether he's going to support her. do we have that, guys, coming?

>> this iss about the role she played around four dead americansan when it seems to be that the story coming out of the administration and she's the point person is so disconnected to reality, i don't trust her. the reason i don't trust her is because i think she knew better, and if she didn't know better, she shouldn't be the voice of america. dead set on making sure we don't promote anybody that was an essential player in the benghazi deback kell. >> okay, kt. there's going to be a war. >> i don't think the president will appoint her. there are a couple of things. one, she's now disqualified. >> did you see how the president came out? >> of course he did. but you know why? he says we're not going to defend her, if he didn't defend her, she could tell everybody who wrote those talking points, who gave her that information. i think he's got to look like he's going to appoint her and at the very end of the day he won't. why? because in the senate confirmation hearings, that would be like a watergate hearing. they would have that whole

benghazi draped over her under oath who told you what. it was just exactly what they're trying to avoid which is a congressional inquiry on benghazi, so i think what will happen is they'll talk about her. at the pentagon there's an expression you fly it up the flag pole to see if anybody salutes. in this case nobody will salute. they'll give her some other job that doesn't require senate confirmation. >> if she had access to classified and unclassified information, she knew or could have known what petraeus said in the first cia report. >> my guess is what happened -- i mean, when i was in the white house the way we did things like this, an intelligence briefing the cia.e come from it woulden have been part of a package. it would have been tab c. tab a would have been here's what we want you to say. here's some q and as you're going to use. so the question is who rewrote what the cia said, and i think the only people who were in a position to do that given my long experience in the white

house and at the pentagon is somebody on the national securityen council or higher. >> all right. do you think that they'll be able to call in any of these hearings or t again, they're not agreeing to a senate select committee. >> everybody claims executive privilege in a case like that. if they're subpoenaed, they have to testify like they did during water gait, iran-contra. >> how about fast and furious? >> yeah. >> nobody cared and nobody showed up. this case is a little different. why? because it's a sex scandal now. that's part of the problem. >> it takes the focus off of the four dead americans into the at this time titilateing who did what to when. >> at the end of the t day, we'l find out. >> hopefully we'll find out before too long. kt, sllo good to have you here. >> thanks, judge. coming up, did the fbi cover up the petraeus scandal and why

were they even involved in the first place? later, the two women at the center of the petraeus scandal. who are jill kelley and paula broadwell?el what makes the sleep number sre different? you walk into a conventional mattress store, it's really not about you. we have so much technology in our store to really show the customers what's going on with their bodies. you can see a little more pressure in the shoulders and in the hips. ... now you can feel what happens as we raise your sleep number settingnd allow the bed to contour to your individual shape. oh, wow. that feels really good. at sleep number we've created a collection of innovations dedicated to individualizing your comfort. the sleep number collection, designed around the innovative sleep number bed - a bed with dualair technology that allows you to adjust to the exact comfort your body needs. each of your bodies. so whatever you feel like, sleep number's going to provide it for you. during the final days of our semi-annual sleep sale, save $500 on our classic series special edition bed set

plus special financing on selected beds but hurry sale ends sunday. you'll only find the innovative sleep number bed at one of our 400 stores, where queen mattresses start at just $699.

both the fbi and the cia are investigating david petraeus. with me is former fbi assistant director and cia trained case officer lieutenant colonel tony schaefer. pat, we'rete delighted to have u here and you were the head of the f.b.i. haven't seen you in a long time. good to see you. quickly, pat. a civilian complains she's being stalked by e-mails. if i'm a civilian and i call and

say i'm being cyber stalked, is the fbi going to get involved? >> listen. >> no. that's a yes or no. if you attached the name petraeus, yes. >> that's not the thing. >> so you're going to take my complaint until you see whether i'm sleeping with petraeus. >> the information indicates that she thought that the general could have been being stalked. >> yeah. >> if that's the t case, you hae level government official. >> which general, allen or petraeus? >> we'll, we'll find out when we see the complaint. >> all right. so let's assume the fbi does this investigation at the rec of jill kelley. i don't know if you have the guys have the picture of the buff, bald fbi complainant. not her, that's jill kelley. the fbi sent her a picture of himself. check that out, pat. someone worked for you and did that, would you be upset? >> yeah. i think the picture is taken somewhat out of context. >> i don't care. i'm looking at it. he sent it to a married woman. >> yeah. i don't think that should be looked at as to why that photo was being sent out.

>> i guess maybe she was an attractive lady who sent off some vibes. that's for the next segment. you've got the f.b.i. they're v investigating petraeu. all right. the fbi, tony, has an obligation to do what when they're investigating the head of the cia. >> well, there's a practical and political aspect which you have to follow. title 50 requires that certain individuals of both congress and the white house being notified of anything related to intelligence operations or leadership. in this case i spoke to a former director of cia and i asked him the question directly. if your name came up as part of an fbi investigation or adjacent to an fbi vacation, how long would it take tor your name to get up to the president? he said two or three hours. if h the president was out of te country, probably aay day. no more than that. >> pat, obviously you had nothing to do with this. i want everyone to try to understand what happens in the f.b.i. if theet fbi is then investigatg the head of the cia, now, remember,he this started in may. they knew it was petraeus by the summer, and they actually

interviewed petraeus and his paramour broadwell for the second time in september or october. wouldn't they have an obligation to tell the president? >> well, listen. the fbi works with the department of justice and eric holder stated he was aware of the investigation. >> why didn't holder tell the president? >> that i can't answer you. i can tell you that bob muller is a very ethical man, a very good man. >> i have to agree with you, pat. >> no doubt in my mind that they advised the attorney general. why the attorney general did not advise the president i think we need to follow up on. >> it's called denialability. they want through fast and furious. >> i've been in washington long enough to understand. you can pass information without having a paper trail. there's no possible way the president could not have known that general petraeus was part of something going on with the f.b.i. there's to conceivable way. >> all right. pat, back to you again. the fbi after petraeus resigned, they go in and they execute a

search warrant of paula broadwell's house on the monday after he resigned when they've been investigating her for six or seven months. >> well, we know from the media that they pulled documents from google and other providers that hads her e-mail. >> pat, you and i could do that with a espn in a minute and a half. but they're going in now and finding confidential documents. >> butde it doesn't take the fbi that long, pat. >>ak well, you know, we need to really see how this investigation plays out and how the information came to the fbi and what that complaint stated. >> the reason jill kelley sent it so that guy is because he sent a picture of himself. tony, how does it end? >> we've got to look at the fact that now classified information is involved, both fbi and cia now investigating. that's something that's very serious. it changes the whole tenor of this thing. i'm with you on this, judge. the moment you think anything untoward ma may be having with

classified information, you should have done the search warrant. >> of course. something's going on here. pat, good to see you, thanks for being with us this evening, and of course, lieutenant colum coll tony schaefer. coming up, what do the men and women of our military think of the handling of the benghazi attack. later, w e break down the sex scandal soap opera playing out in washington. can't wait to see this one. in . can't wait to see this one.

live from america's news headquarters, i'm marianne rafferty. divers are voferred a body near the rig in the gulf of mexico. the coast guard called off a search for two workers who disappeared after the accident. investigators are confirming that divers hired by the platform's owner found a body late saturday. no word if it's one of those missing workers. after days of almost

continues hamas rocket attacks on israel, the israeli air force has stepped up its air raids on targets in gaza and placed attention and heavy armor on the border, ready to move in if necessary. more than 100 militant rockets launched at israel saturday including two aimed at tel aviv. the white house says israel has the right to defend itself and both the israel and the u.s. want an end to rocket fire coming from the hamas-ruled gaza strip. i'm marianne rafferty. now back to justice with judge jennnine. our veterans and our active duty military are angry. they've lost any trust in this commander-in-chief that they might have once had, and i'm telling you. i've never seen them so angry as they are with good reason. >> former cia director david behind closedfied doors and what he said was paul

back from what he said in the days after 9/11. colonel david hunt in new york city and general mcenearny. >> we heard how the men and the women in the military are furious. is this what you're hearing? iry understand that you recently visited some of the y wounded warriors. >>he yes, but they didn't necessarily speak about this. they have given me obviously other opinions on our rules of engagement, but clearly, judge, the military did not take any action. they were not directed to take any action which they could have had some impact on it, notably, number one, if we had just put f-16s as quickly as we could over benghazi. whether they would have been on time or not, we don't know because we didn't do it. we did put within one hour out

of the white house came direction to put an unarmed predator, came out of italy on scene. >> what did the unarmed predator than tell the white house what was going on? what did that do? >> well, that's very, very important. it gave them situational awareness so they could have taken follow on action. >> the point is they had it, general, and they didn't do anything with a it. >> precisely. that's my point. they didn't follow up. they didn't have a concerted effort to have other assets flowing. they search could not have had a quick reaction ground force team because they were so ill-prepared in their preplanning, but they could have gotten some air power. whether it would have been successful or not, i don't know because theyer didn't even try. >> all right. and you know, colonel hunt, you're nodding your head while the general is talking. you agree? >>ou yeah. we search could have had something there in four hours.

the president of the united states did not give the order or the department of defense is now all of a sudden totally incompetent which they're not after 11 years of combat. this is a case of they didn't get an order. there's frustration in the military over this because we know how to do this kind of work. we were never allowed to do it. >> you know what's interesting, gentlemen, is the president at the press conference said i gave the orders to do whatever we do to make sure they're safe, but he never really said i gave them permission to actually go into libya and get our men back. >> either that is not a true statement that the president said or he gave that order to the secretary of defense and he slo rolled it. he didn't do it. it's either/or. the only person that can move forces into libya is the sec-def or the white house. >> the white house wouldn't roll under the bus for the secretary of defense. >> no. >> general, are you of the same

opinion? he didn't answer the question. when they went right at him in the first press conference in eight months, he said i told need todo whatever we do to make sure they're safe. that's double speak, isn't it, general? >> absolutely. they didn't do anything. they did launch a predator. we know that, or they diverted but what else followed, they moved some forces out of tripol i into benghazi which was important, an eight-man team. they moved force the from italy, but that was much too late. they didn't take any quick reaction t actions that could he had an impact on the scene to save those four lives or at least two of those four lives. >>as colonel hunt, look. what you've got is a fight going on from 9:40 in the evening until after four or 5 in the morning,ve depending on whose te line you believe. what's amazing is they're watching the same thing and that their time lines are different.

not like you didn't have time to get people there. >> we had seven hours, at least. f-16s, within two hours could have been over the target and people on the ground within four. that's the lack of a presidential order and/or the secretary of defense's incompetence. with 11 years of continuous combat, our air force, army, special ratio operations and mas know how to do it. they weren't told. >> the rules of engagement, do they effect whether or not the decision is made to accepted in the f-16s. >> what happens once they're sent, not to send them is an order given right. that's in the first instance. >> general, do you think we'll get to the bottom of whether or not the general petraeus, you know, actually said or knew that it was al-qaeda? >> well, we know that he knew that isht was. there's no question about it after his testimony on friday,

and i think that in the circuit, everybody knows that'sst what he was going to say, and he was not going to be caught for lying under oath. >> okay. but general, because we're coming up on a break here. >> yeah. >> really quickly, should he have said something after 9/14 when he went out? should he have said look, guys, you didn't understand me. the president is talking about a video, but i said al-qaeda connected. should he have said something in those six weeks? >> he should have said something. >> she shoul he should have saig on the 14th. >> thanks for being with us this evening. always a pleasure. coming up, the whistle blower that blew the lid off the petraeus affair. who is this woman, jill kelley? later, did two of the top ranking army generals interfere in a parent-child relationship? did they use their positions to protect a woman and her custody of her children? of the childre.

who is jill kelley, this so-called tampa socialite at the center of the petraeus scandal? one society writer said of her i have s no at a who she is. i'ved handled all the mainly events in this town for a long time now, and i'm a little surprised i don't know her. with me is someone who does know

jill kelley, tampa bay magazine editor who joins me from florida. gogood evening, aaron. d evening, judge. can you please tell us what it is that caused jill kelley to be so attracted by the military and the base that she got so involved with the people there? >> here in tampa mac mcdill air force base is probably one of the biggest economic factors that we have, and fortunately some of the most talented military men and women in the world comed through that base. they have have great personalities, they have wonderful histories. you know, i can remember back when general norman schwartzkopf came in. they're charming, wonderful people that everybody admires and are more than happy to be friendly with.

>> well, when she first moved to tampa, she apparently got herself involved at the base and then finally started getting some titles like honorary counsel, and i think she even had that emblazeoned on her mer mercedes plates. it's a position for which she's not paid. there are no requirements. it's just a title. do you know how it is she got to bego named the honorary counselo i believe it's korea, south or north korea? y. >> i believe she became friendly with some of the military people that come from other countries on the base. there are many, many of them, and probably indicated that she was willing to try and help them do various things in the country and somebody suggested they could make her counsel, and with

that, she went to the state of florida and applied for those plates which apparently is a normal process. i guess there are more than 100 such people in the state of florida. >> yo but i understand from the department of motor vehicles, they issued a statement saying she had to have been a member of the honorary council and she shouldn't have gotten those plates and there's an investigation, but let me go back into something. when you say that, you know, she wanted to help out, a new york businessman says that she asked him for an $80 million commission if she used her influence to win a south korean business contract for her being this honorary counsel with no official duties. are you aware of that? >> i've heard that, and again, i don't know anything about that, but i think that's a very unusual thing. mostly what jill was doing was

helping the wives of the military that moved here to find out what to do in tampa. >> did you say she was helping the wives? so why is she sending tens of thousands of e-mails to general allen, and general allen's wife is reported to have said keep her away from my husband? >>in again, i don't know what general allen's wife said. i'm sure general allen if he didn't want to get e-mails could have very effectively said please don't send me any further e-mails. i don't personally e-mail, but i'm sure other people e-mail all day long. that's the means they use to communicate. >> those e-mails are purported to have been flirtatious and inappropriate between her and general allen. the interesting thing is the genesis of this whole petraeus sex scandal was jill. jill contacted a guy from the fbi and says, you know, i'm getting these stalking e-mails orin these e-mails. they're threatening me and

telling me to stay way from petraeus. now, it f turns out broadwell, petraeus' pairmour, sends them to jill. why is petraeus' paramour worried about jill kelley if jille kelley is only trying to help the wives? >> again, i don't know why paula did what she did, but apparently she felt there was a threat there, but just because she felt there was a threat doesn't necessarily mean there was anything inappropriate between the general and jill kelley. >> finally, finally. >> he's admitted to that. >> finally, she's called a socialite but they're millions of dollars in debt. their home is in foreclosure, they've been sued nine times, their credit card has been stopped. how is she a socialite? doesn't she seem more like a desperate woman trying to make money off her connections in the military?

>> again, that may be what it is at this time, but the term socialite again is just a term that somebody used. i don't know who would describe her as that. i personally would always describe her simply as the wife of a very successful doctor. >> well, okay. you can call her a socialite and probably a lot of other names you could call her. anyway, aaron, thanks for being with us this evening. coming up, it's long been said that women love a man in uniform. did the women involved do it for the love of the uniform or something more? uniform or manage more. [ cheeping ] [ male announcer ] you hear that? that's the sound of car insurance compani these days. here a cheap, there a cheap, everywhere a cheap... you get it. so, what if instead of just a cheap choice, you could make a smart choice?

like, esurance for example. they were born online and built to save people money from the beginning. it's what they've always done. not just something they cheap about. that's insurance for the modern world. esurance. now backed by allstate. click or call.

the petraeus love scandal has been the fodder for headlines for a week with such zingers as the other other woman and cloak and shakin shag her. the scandal has been an editor's dream. we kneew men in uniform saw action, but this isn't what we meant. here to get to the bottom of what's playing out like the real generals of dc or the real generals of tampa is a republican strategist and fox news contributor steve crowder. is this about love? if i met you about another time in my life or is this about high rolling bimbos? >> what show did i roll into? cloak and shag her? what happened to words like

floozy or harlot. plano texas has one of the highest debt rates. people who make 85,000 want to live like they're making 500,000. this lady is essentially a glorified kardashian with access to people who can lead wars. >> l she's in debted for millios of dollars. >> in actually think she went to the f.b.i. if she was really concerned, she would have called the trades and said hey, i'm getting strange e-mails. she goes to the f.b.i. she doesn't realize that the fbi is going to do a total investigation on her as well. >> that's great point, don't you think. >> she's getting e-mails saying stay away from petraeus. why wouldn't she go to him and say i'm getting these e-mails? >>ti if she had shame. >> she thought she was so connected that nobody could bring her down. >>ri that's like a double entendre. >> lawsuit that could come forth is a civil one and that's

between jill kelley and brawb fopaula broadwell for being cybr stalked. >> do you think anyone is going to say to paula broadwell you were sleeping with the head of the cia so you could write a biography about him which you've never done before and you had no credentials to do and so therefore we're going to award you money. >> they believed that a terrorist attack was caused by a youtube video. you never know. >> look for gloria allred to call jill kelley. >> her name shall not be spoken in the studio. >> but aren't you concerned about the fact that men can be so weak that they can be manipulated like this? >> here's the thing. men are filthy animals. they'red. disgusting. if you could read my mind 23 hours a day, my wife would divorce me. we're sick human,. we're sexually predatorial.

>> you're wired differently. >> i appreciate you saying that that's why it is important to get to the bottom of it. if we followed, for example, the media narrative, let's say anthony weiner, today, andrew breitbart's name would be barred and do you realize the kind of leverage you could have on a public official when you have those kinds of pictures and e-mails? >> these guys knew. >> right. >> k they knew that they were ia position, okay, let me put it out there. do you know general allen and general petraeus both wrote letters on behalf of jill kelley's center ijillkelley's sy battle? they used their letterhead, general allen and general petraeus for this bimbo's sister who a court ruled shouldn't be ebdentitled to custody of her on

chairn. shame on general allen and shame on general petraeus to allow themselves to interfere in a child custody. >> when a powerful man gets to the top, he thinks he's invincible. elliot spitzer. they think they're above the law. women go after these powerful men to attach their identity to them. she actually thought that she should have immunity because she was at that level. >> it doesn't what matter people do in their own time. the truth matters. integrity matter, period. >> great having you on tonight. that's it for us tonight. thanks for joining us. please be sure to follow me on twitter at judge jeanine. check out ourud show page on foxnews.com. you can catch up on anything you missed from the show. sure to pick up a copy of my books, sly fox. it's available for holiday gifts. e-mail us your comments. my next book is going to be about these guys that are so

weak that they can't say no. samshame on them. goodnight. my insurance rates e probably gonna double. but, dad, you've got... [ voice of dennis ] allstate. with accident forgiveness, they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. [ voice of dennis ] indeed. are you in good hands?

so, which supeast 4g lte service would yochoose, based on this chart ? don't rush into it, i'm not looking for the fastest answer. obviously verizon. okay, i have a different chart. going that way, does that make a difference ? look at verizon. it's so much more than the other ones. so what if we just changed the format altogether ? isn't that the exact same thing ? it's pretty clear. still sticking with verizon. verizon. more 4g lte coverage than all other networks combined.